Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 21st November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Londonderry Sentinel site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

War of words over Waterside flags issue



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
03 September 2008
A WAR of words has erupted between the DUP's William Hay and loyalist representatives over the Waterside flags issue.
Earlier in the year the Ulster Political Research Group (UPRG), the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP) Conflict Transformation Initiative (CTI) and React North West, launched a joint protocol encouraging Protestant Unionist and Loyalist (PUL) communiti
es to display flags only from the outset to the conclusion of the marching season.
Londonderry's parade season concluded on Saturday with the Royal Black Perceptory's parade, and on Monday loyalist representatives commenced the removal of the flags from lamposts. These are to be handed back to the various communities for reuse.
Part of the initiative was designed to prevent the flying of flags all year round and stop them becoming tattered. The protocol also asked communities to fly recognised state flags such as the Union Jack and the flag of Northern Ireland.
UPRG representative, David Malcolm, told the Sentinel that the initiative was a success, and he was aware of only one breach of the agreement not to fly paramilitary flags. This single incident, he said, happened at Clooney where a UFF flag was hoisted but removed quickly after the loyalist groups became aware of it.
Two communities, the Fountain and Newbuildings decided not to enter into the voluntary arrangement.
David Malcolm, however was highly critical of mainsteam unionist political parties and claimed that they had claimed credit for the success of the initiative despite, he claimed, having no actual involvement in liasing with communities on the issue.
"They are prepared to take the plaudits, but they are not prepared to put the work in. They haven't actually come to us with regard to work on the ground," said David Malcolm.
The loyalist representative also extended his criticism of mainstream unionists to an alleged lack of input to work at interface areas, stating that community workers and loyalist groups were the people actually on the ground preventing trouble.
Alderman William Hay of the DUP rejected loyalist claims that unionist politicians had jumped on the 'bandwagon' and stated: "I am not prepared to take lectures from people who drove fear into unionist communities from years.
"This wider initiative would have happened a lot sooner if had not been for loyalist paramilitaries, who speak for nobody and represent nobody, putting flags up against the wishes of people. In Newbuildings flags are put up without dictation and fear."



The full article contains 426 words and appears in Londonderry Sentinel newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 September 2008 6:13 PM
  • Source: Londonderry Sentinel
  • Location: Waterside
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.